powered by Pro Mach video

Pro Mach Web Site
ProCustomer Industry Leading Aftermarket Support
Allpax Retort Sterilization & Automation Systems
Axon Shrink & Stretch Sleeve Application Systems
Benchmark Food Distribution & Loading Systems
Brenton Case & Tray Packing & Robotic Systems
Currie by Brenton Conventional & Robotic Palletizing Systems
Dekka Case Taping Systems
Edson High Performance Case & Tray Packing Systems
EOL Packaging End of line Applications & Systems
EPI Labelers Flexible Packaging Labeling Systems
Federal Liquid Filling & Capping Systems
Flexible Packaging Flexible Packaging Applications & Systems
FLtecnics Rollstock Pouch Packaging Systems
Greydon Flexible Packaging Coding Systems
ID Technology Labeling, Marking & Coding Systems
Inever Stickpack & Sachet Packaging Systems
IPak Machinery Tray & Bliss Forming Systems
Jalbert Automation Services
KLEENLine Sanitary Product Handling Systems
LSI Pressure Sensitive Labeling Systems
Matrix Vertical Form Fill Seal Systems
NJM Packaging Pharmaceutical Packaging Systems
Orion Packaging Stretch & Pallet Wrapping Systems
Ossid Tray Packaging & Weighing Systems
Pace Packaging Bottle Unscrambling & Orienting Systems
Pacific Packaging Viscous Filling & Capping Systems
P.E. Labellers Decorative Labeling Systems
Rennco Vertical Bagging & Heat Sealing Systems
Roberts PolyPro Bottle & Box Handles & Application Systems
Shuttleworth Conveying & Material Handling Systems
Southern Packaging Rollstock Pouch Packaging Systems
Tekkra Shrink Bundling Systems
Texwrap Shrink Wrapping Systems
Toyo Jidoki Pre-Made Pouch Packaging Systems
Weiler Labeling Labeling & Serialization Systems
Wexxar/BEL Case Forming & Sealing Systems
Zalkin Americas Capping & Cap Handling Systems
Zalkin EMAA Capping & Cap Handling Systems
Zarpac Engineering & Integration Services

Powered by Pro Mach

Update on UDI Implementation

tt_er[1]The FDA sought detailed feedback from medical device manufactures and hospitals on a unique device identification database (UDID) prototype recently. A pilot study, conducted in August of 2009, was done to determine the feasibility of collecting and storing UDI data from the supplier to the product’s point of use at five hospitals. The study included data on 621 devices.

The results point to a bit of confusion over how to handle data. Overall, participants thought that the UDI database prototype performed well, but there were concerns about the amount of data suppliers would need to provide. They also had questions about locating the information once in the database.

Recommendations to the FDA from suppliers and users include implementing a more automated way to upload data to the database, the ability to change or edit a UDI code once it is entered into the database, and a finalized list of UDI attributes to make it easier for manufacturers to comply with the data requirements.

Manufacturers also want the FDA to clarify definitions to be used in the database and settle on the standards the definitions should meet. Most agree that either the GS1 or the Health Industry Business Communications Council standards should be used.

As a result of this pilot, the FDA has some clear feedback as to what suppliers and users need from the UDID and will begin drafting regulations to implement UDI.

You can read the full report on the study here

Share Button

Speak Your Mind

*